|
My name is Amy. I am an adoptee from Indiana. I began searching lightly about ten years ago. This past year has been a rough one. I contacted the adoption agency. I paid $325 to have my first mother contacted. She refused contact. As a result, I have spent the last year educating myself on adoption. It has been an eye opening experience.
There are many myths about adoption.The National Council for Adoption and Catholic Charities and many others feed these myths. As time moves forward, our voices will no longer be silenced. We are slowly but surely disspelling the lies.
First parent confidentiality is the biggest lie. The confidentiality issue was initially established to protect the adoptee from illegitimacy. Birth certificates were stamped with bastard or illegitimate. It became about protecting the adoptive parents from firt parents. Many adoptive parents were and still are afraid that first parents will come and take their kids back. If an adoption is done in the best interests of the child, then neither set of parents have anything to fear. With the last ten years or so, the confidentiality became about first parents. With first parents speaking out, this lie is hopefully going to be ended soon.
With the Evan B. Donaldson Institute putting out that 90% of first parents wanting contact, with Oregon stats showing that 99% of first parents wanting contact, and first mother bloggers, these groups are showing themselves to be the liars. In two major court cases in Tennessee and Oregon, it was decided that first parents did not have the fundamental right to have their child adopted; thereby also could not have those adoptions guaranteed privacy. In contraception, abortion, and parenting, women are exercising their right to privacy. In adoption, first parents are relinquishing their rights.
As an adoptee, I believe that all in the adoption plane deserve access to the records. Adoptees in fourty five states do not have unrestricted access to their original birth certificates. It records our birth. The non adopted have access to their birth certificates. They do not have to ask their parents for access. Adoptees in this country have to do just that.
Allowing access to our records does not mean that we have the right to a relationship to another person. Allowing access to our records does not mean that we have the right to our parents medical records. To assume that is what we want is wrong. I am not saying that it will not happen. If we as adults take it too far, it is considered stalking. There are laws in place to protect people from stalkers. As adults, we want to be treated as adults. We want the same rights as others. We want to make the same decisions that others are allowed to make.
It is time to change the laws in this country. We have several cases that indicate very serious rights violations on the part of both adoption agencies and adoptive parents. With cases like Rashad Head and Shawn McDonald, first father rights are being ignored. Adoption agencies use putative registries against fathers. In Rashad’s case, he was registered on both the Florida and Georgia registries. He even filed his paternity claim within five days of his son’s birth. He worked two jobs to help provide for his son but the first mother’s parents refused it. Shawn McDonald found out two days before the birth of his child that he was going to be father. In Stephanie Bennett’s case, she was having problems within the family. She was a young mother. She went to her high school counselor for guidance. What she got was an adoption agency pamphlet. She was counseled into running away from home. Only in adoption are minors allowed to sign a contract that relinquishes their rights. A minor cannot enter a contract in any other area. They can’t sign a contract without parental knowledge and consent. In another story, three young women knock the maternity home’s director on the head, take off with her purse, and a minivan. These young girls had no history of violence, behavior problems, or drugs. They were sent there to give up their babies.
With the research that I have read, I do know that first parents suffer a great deal. They have to deal with negative views from society as a whole. In one sector of society, they are glorified as doing the loving thing. In another part of society they are demonized for giving their children up. Many of these women and men did not have a choice especially back in the fifties, sixties, and seventies. In a majority of cases, these women have suffered from post traumatic stress disorder, depression, low self esteem, and many other disorders. All these women did was have a baby. Having a baby is part of nature. Having sex is natural. Our society has condemned them repetitively.
I have come to the conclusion that the laws should be decided by adoptees and their families. They should not be influenced by the adoption agencies, their attorneys, nor their lobbists. This is what is occurring now. We are the ones that are affected by these laws. They should reflect our feelings, our thoughts, and our relatiohships.
Registries don’t work. Most registries have a success rate of 4% to 6%. Indiana has the best in the country with 14%. They are too restrictive. In the state of Indiana, the first mother is the one that has the final say. Every registry varies from state to state.
Confidential Intermediaries don’t work either. Most first parents have had horrible experiences with social workers. Most do not want to be revisited by them. Many are not trained well enough to handle the complicated intracies of adoption. They can without fault of their own affect the way a reunion is handled. In Oregon alone, only .25% of first parents wanted contact in that matter. That alone should should speak massive volumes to state legislators.
An adoptee should not have to ask permission to see something that records their birth. Adoptees should be allowed to handle their relationships with their parents without governmental interference. The right to privacy is about the right to be free from governmental interference, yet adoptees’ rights are continually violated. We have to suffer through rude state employees, harsh comments, and condescending words just to get our information.
When an adoptee searches, it is about us. It is not about our adoptive parents. It is not a matter of being grateful. It is not about being property because our parents have bought and paid big money for us. If that is the way you think, then you consider us slaves to our parents. The adoption contract was made about us for our best interests. When we become adults, we should be allowed access to something that is ours. A non-adopted person’s parents does not own their birth certificate. Why are ours owned by our first parents and adoptive parents? We are adults. Give us our birth certificates.
|